The pastor said he was indifferent to the criticism and attacks that would likely greet his order
Pastor John Anosike of the New World Faith Ministry says his members must honour him as their spiritual father by surrendering their ‘first fruit of the year’ to him.
He said he was entitled to the church members’ first earnings of the year, as it would be spent on his welfare.
Despite the potential backlash and criticism that such a directive might attract, Pastor Anosike remains resolute in his stance. He explicitly states his indifference to the expected criticism and attacks, expressing fearlessness in the face of potential controversy. This unwavering attitude raises questions about the motivations behind such a directive and the impact it may have on the trust and faith of his congregants.
The concept of ‘first fruit’ offerings has deep roots in some religious traditions, where followers offer a portion of their first harvest or income as a symbolic gesture of gratitude and dedication. However, Pastor Anosike’s directive appears to deviate from the traditional understanding of this practice. While ‘first fruit’ offerings are often viewed as voluntary and symbolic, the pastor’s explicit call for January salaries raises concerns about the potential exploitation of religious authority.
The directive prompts discussions about financial transparency within religious institutions. Congregants are often expected to contribute financially to support the operations and activities of their churches, but clear communication and accountability are essential. Congregants have the right to understand how their contributions are being utilized and whether they align with the principles of transparency and stewardship.
The call for congregants to surrender their January salaries can have a profound impact on the financial well-being of individuals within the church. In many cases, congregants may be grappling with personal financial challenges, and such a directive could exacerbate their difficulties. The ethical implications of a religious leader benefiting personally from the financial hardships of their followers raise questions about the responsibilities and ethical considerations associated with pastoral leadership.
Anosike stated he was indifferent to the criticism and attacks that would likely greet his order, adding that he feared no one.
He spoke in a video which was recorded during one of the church’s programs.
Anosike told members of his church that they would testify before the middle of the year if they gave him their first fruit, adding that he would return the money if the members don’t witness a change in fortune.
“Your first-month salary is your first fruit of the year. It is for me and not for the church. I want to challenge you by the spirit of God, I fear nobody and I fear no criticism.
“If you call me your spiritual father, or mentor, this first month’s salary, which is your first fruit of the year, is for me and not for the church.
“It is for this altar. It is for this oracle, which is me. Are you hearing me? It is for this vessel. It is meant for my welfare.
“If you honor me with the first fruit of your first year, in the middle of this year, if you don’t testify, come back, I will give it back to you. You will see wonders. Covenant with my spirit.”
Video:
https://fb.watch/pEXVWdKhjF/?mibextid=Nif5oz
The directive from Pastor John Anosike of the New World Faith Ministry, urging congregants to surrender their January salaries for his welfare, has ignited a debate on the ethical considerations surrounding financial practices within religious institutions. As discussions unfold, questions of transparency, accountability, and the impact on congregants’ financial well-being will likely shape the discourse. The broader implications of such directives may prompt a reevaluation of the expectations placed on congregants and the responsibilities of religious leaders in fostering trust and integrity within their communities.
